<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Insert name here &#187; 2008</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.tanist.co.uk/category/windows-server/2008/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.tanist.co.uk</link>
	<description>Web development and general IT snippets, possibly some other irrelevant things too.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 13:35:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Outlook 2007 Crash/Hang under VirtualBox on MacOS</title>
		<link>http://blog.tanist.co.uk/2009/06/outlook-2007-crashhang-under-virtualbox-on-macos/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.tanist.co.uk/2009/06/outlook-2007-crashhang-under-virtualbox-on-macos/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 09:45:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Henry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows Server]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hang]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[osx]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[outlook 2007]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[virtualbox]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tanist.co.uk/?p=167</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I recently installed a Windows XP virtual machine under MacOS using virtualbox, only to discover that Outlook 2007 would hang when opened (unable to connect to exchange). It seems the issue has been documented in the following ticket but no resolution has been posted. Outlook 2003 seems to works without a problem.
Update: I&#8217;ve discovered that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recently installed a Windows XP virtual machine under MacOS using virtualbox, only to discover that Outlook 2007 would hang when opened (unable to connect to exchange). It seems the issue has been documented in the following <a href="http://www.virtualbox.org/ticket/4150">ticket</a> but no resolution has been posted. Outlook 2003 seems to works without a problem.</p>
<p>Update: I&#8217;ve discovered that Outlook 2007 works fine if you switch the networking options in virtualbox from &#8220;NAT&#8221; to &#8220;Bridged&#8221;. It also fixed some other issues I was having (mapped network drives and group policy didn&#8217;t get applied. For reference the domain controller is a Windows 2008 SBS server.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.tanist.co.uk/2009/06/outlook-2007-crashhang-under-virtualbox-on-macos/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Internet time tab missing in server 2008</title>
		<link>http://blog.tanist.co.uk/2009/04/internet-time-tab-missing-in-server-2008/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.tanist.co.uk/2009/04/internet-time-tab-missing-in-server-2008/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 09:42:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows Server]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet time]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[missing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tab]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[time]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tanist.co.uk/?p=151</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just noticed that all the computer clocks on a network were 5 minutes out. Went to the server (Windows Server 2008 Standard), to check the internet time synchronisation only to find that the usual Internet time tab on the clock/date control panel was completely missing. I didn&#8217;t bother investigating exactly why this is, but found [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just noticed that all the computer clocks on a network were 5 minutes out. Went to the server (Windows Server 2008 Standard), to check the internet time synchronisation only to find that the usual Internet time tab on the clock/date control panel was completely missing. I didn&#8217;t bother investigating exactly why this is, but found the following solution.</p>
<blockquote><p>w32tm /config /syncfromflags:MANUAL /manualpeerlist:time.nist.gov<br />
w32tm /config /update</p></blockquote>
<p>Obviously you can use your preferred time server instead of time.nist.gov, but run these two commands and wait a few minutes, and you should see your clock correct itself. The process will show &#8216;time-service&#8217; events in the system event log to confirm your changes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.tanist.co.uk/2009/04/internet-time-tab-missing-in-server-2008/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Vista Hangs on Logon, very slow at Welcome Screen</title>
		<link>http://blog.tanist.co.uk/2008/12/vista-hangs-on-logon-very-slow-at-welcome-screen/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.tanist.co.uk/2008/12/vista-hangs-on-logon-very-slow-at-welcome-screen/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Dec 2008 21:49:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Henry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vista]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows Server]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[logon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[slow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[verbose status messages]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tanist.co.uk/?p=51</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We had this problem on our Vista machines in the office whereby they would get stuck during the logon process. We couldn&#8217;t for the life of us pinpoint the problem, as the logon information is very vague. Then I remembered a neat feature from XP which is also available in Vista. The key was to enabled Verbose [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We had this problem on our Vista machines in the office whereby they would get stuck during the logon process. We couldn&#8217;t for the life of us pinpoint the problem, as the logon information is very vague. Then I remembered a neat feature from XP which is also available in Vista. The key was to enabled Verbose logon information to find out what exactly was going on:</p>
<p>If you are using a stand-alone computer or if you want to enable verbose status messages on only one computer, follow these steps:</p>
<ol>
<li>Click Start, and then click Run.</li>
<li>In the Open box, type gpedit.msc, and then click OK.</li>
<li>Expand Computer Configuration, expand Administrative Templates, and then click System.</li>
<li>In the right pane, double-click Verbose vs normal status messages.</li>
<li>Click Enabled, and then click OK.</li>
<li>Close Group Policy Object Editor, and then click OK.</li>
</ol>
<p>Run a gpupdate /force if you can. After doing this, we noticed our machines were hanging at the printers group policy. After disabling the offending printer policy, logon worked fine again. As techies we decided to leave Verbose Status Messages switched on, as it can actually be very useful. Check out Chris&#8217;s previous post for more on our <a href="http://blog.tanist.co.uk/2008/11/deploying-printers-from-x64-servers-to-x86-clients/">printer issues</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.tanist.co.uk/2008/12/vista-hangs-on-logon-very-slow-at-welcome-screen/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>_sbs_netsetup doesn&#8217;t log off</title>
		<link>http://blog.tanist.co.uk/2008/11/_sbs_netsetup-doesnt-log-off/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.tanist.co.uk/2008/11/_sbs_netsetup-doesnt-log-off/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 08:27:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows Server]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domain addition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sbs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[setup]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tanist.co.uk/?p=40</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We&#8217;ve been having lots of fun (or not) installing our action pack version of Small Business Server 2008. All of our client machines need to be disconnected from the old domain and then re-connected to the new one. We decided NOT to use the new 2008 migration tool for reasons which I wont go into [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;ve been having lots of fun (or not) installing our action pack version of Small Business Server 2008. All of our client machines need to be disconnected from the old domain and then re-connected to the new one. We decided NOT to use the new 2008 migration tool for reasons which I wont go into here, so are having to migrate manually.</p>
<p>When connecting a computer via the SBS connection wizard (found at the URL http://connect) by default, we found that when the _sbs_netsetup user logs on, that it does not log off again, and any attempt to log off manually just causes it to automatically log back on.</p>
<p>To solve this we needed to grant local administrator rights to the local user _sbs_netsetup. Obviously as the user is currently logged on and you cannot log off in order to log back on as an administrator, it is not possible to do this on the local machine. To do this, follow these steps:</p>
<blockquote>
<ol>
<li>Run MMC on your server</li>
<li>Add computer management snap-in and set it to manage the computer in question</li>
<li>Browse to Local Users and Groups / Users</li>
<li>Add _sbs_netsetup to the Administrators group</li>
<li>Log off the local machine</li>
</ol>
</blockquote>
<p>Now the SBS setup process should complete as normal and you should end up with a machine connected to your domain and ready to go!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.tanist.co.uk/2008/11/_sbs_netsetup-doesnt-log-off/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Deploying printers from x64 servers to x86 clients</title>
		<link>http://blog.tanist.co.uk/2008/11/deploying-printers-from-x64-servers-to-x86-clients/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.tanist.co.uk/2008/11/deploying-printers-from-x64-servers-to-x86-clients/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 11:21:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows Server]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deploy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[group policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[installation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[printer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sbs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[x64]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[x86]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tanist.co.uk/?p=43</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ah, the fun with SBS 2008 continues. Today we noticed that one of the printers (an HP Laserjet 2300) we had added to the server for deployment via group policy CSE (client side extensions), was not installing on any clients. This included both x86 Vista and XP machines. The error we were receiving in the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, the fun with SBS 2008 continues. Today we noticed that one of the printers (an HP Laserjet 2300) we had added to the server for deployment via group policy CSE (client side extensions), was not installing on any clients. This included both x86 Vista and XP machines. The error we were receiving in the event log is as follows:</p>
<blockquote><p>The user &#8216;HP LaserJet 2300 Series PCL 6&#8242; preference item in the &#8216;Common {&lt;id&gt;}&#8217; Group Policy object did not apply because it failed with error code &#8216;0&#215;8000ffff Catastrophic failure&#8217; This error was suppressed.</p></blockquote>
<p>This error is not very helpful as you can see, and infact turned out to be that the driver for the printer was not available. This led us into another issue &#8211; that of installing x86 drivers on the server to be available for clients when they connect.</p>
<p>Initially, we thought this would be easy. &#8220;Oh, just go into sharing and tick the x86 box in additional drivers&#8221;, we thought. Having tried to do that it turned out to be a lot more complex than it should be. Ticking this box will ask you to browse to find the x86 version of the x64 driver you currently have installed &#8211; easy. Then it will ask you to &#8216;please provide path to windows media (x86 processor)&#8217; &#8211; OK, that&#8217;s doable?</p>
<p>It seems to be looking for the file ntprint.inf, and wanted to look on a CD-ROM, in the I386 folder by default. So, recognising the folder name we stuck in the XP pro disc, thinking we would be off, but alas, it tries to load the file and then gives the same prompt again! I then decided to search my own workstation (Vista Ultimate x86) for the the file and found the following directory to contain it, as well as an I386 folder.</p>
<blockquote><p>C:\Windows\System32\DriverStore\FileRepository\ntprint.inf_xxxxxx</p></blockquote>
<p>I copied the contents of this directory to the same directory on the server which holds the x86 version of the driver in question, and then went into sharing and ticked the x86 box once more. It again asked for the path to the driver, but this time did not prompt asking for the additional media!</p>
<p>So, in conclusion, it seems you need both your x64 server and an x86 client available in order to get the driver installed, for our printer at least.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.tanist.co.uk/2008/11/deploying-printers-from-x64-servers-to-x86-clients/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FATAL: DcPromo_JoinDomain: The server was not promoted to a domain controller.</title>
		<link>http://blog.tanist.co.uk/2008/10/fatal-dcpromo_joindomain-the-server-was-not-promoted-to-a-domain-controller/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.tanist.co.uk/2008/10/fatal-dcpromo_joindomain-the-server-was-not-promoted-to-a-domain-controller/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 08:00:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Henry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dcpromo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[error message]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[small business server]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows 2008]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tanist.co.uk/?p=30</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I ran into this little devil during my first installation of Windows 2008 Small Business Server (SBS). The setup failed with the error message:
FATAL: DcPromo_JoinDomain: The server was not promoted to a domain controller. 
The solution was surprisingly simple. An active network connection is required to start the setup, however I had disconnected the NIC [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I ran into this little devil during my first installation of Windows 2008 Small Business Server (SBS). The setup failed with the error message:</p>
<blockquote><p><span style="font-size: x-small; font-family: Verdana,Arial,Helvetica;">FATAL: DcPromo_JoinDomain: The server was not promoted to a domain controller. </span></p></blockquote>
<p>The solution was surprisingly simple. An active network connection is required to start the setup, however I had disconnected the NIC during setup. Bad move, this causes the setup to bail out. The solution, of course, is to make sure the network card remians connected for the duration of the setup.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.tanist.co.uk/2008/10/fatal-dcpromo_joindomain-the-server-was-not-promoted-to-a-domain-controller/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Windows 2008 &#8211; First gotcha, requires mammoth 4GB of RAM.</title>
		<link>http://blog.tanist.co.uk/2008/10/windows-2008-first-gotcha-requires-mammoth-4gb-of-ram/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.tanist.co.uk/2008/10/windows-2008-first-gotcha-requires-mammoth-4gb-of-ram/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 08:00:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Henry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows Server]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[memory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ram]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[requirement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sbs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[small business server]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows 2008]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tanist.co.uk/?p=24</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At long last, our HP ML310 server was delivered on Friday. After a bit of a kerfuffle hauling the enormous box up stairs on my own, the much anticipated unboxing could begin.  Well, actually I thought it only fair to fire off an email to everyone else to let them know it had arrived before [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At long last, our HP ML310 server was delivered on Friday. After a bit of a kerfuffle hauling the enormous <span style="color: black;">box</span> up stairs on my own, the much anticipated un<span style="color: black;">box</span>ing could begin.  Well, actually I thought it only fair to fire off an email to everyone else to let them know it had arrived before opening it up.</p>
<p>With politeness out the way, I made a start on opening the <span style="color: black;">box</span>. The arrival of a new server is always an exciting time in the office, lasting approximately 30 seconds (maximum). This server is particularly special as it&#8217;s for our own use. Unfortunately nobody else was around to share the moment and there was no way on earth it could remain <span style="color: black;">box</span>ed, especially not for an entire week while Chris was on holiday.</p>
<p>The plan was to setup the new server with Windows 2008 SBS, we have deployed Windows 2008 before but never Windows Server 2008 Small Business Server &#8211; which is due for release in early November.</p>
<p>With the SBS 2008 DVD in one hand and server in the other (err, you know what I mean), nothing could was going to stop me trying out the new OS. The DVD booted fine and setup began. I left it going in the background and approximately 30 minutes later I heard the fans spin up following a reboot. I eagerly awaited the GUI to load up. Then it hit me&#8230; a non continuable error message stating that 4GB of RAM was required.</p>
<p>I couldn&#8217;t believe this wasn&#8217;t detected earlier in the setup. Lesson learnt &#8211; don&#8217;t just assume your brand new server will meet the <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/sbs/en/us/system-requirements.aspx">minimum requirements</a>. SBS 2003 would run on pretty much anything, but 2008 requires a whole lot more. I guess with the ever decreasing cost of RAM this isn&#8217;t a huge problem. Never the less, it caught me out.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s just compare the difference in minimum requirements for SBS 2003 and SBS 2008</p>
<p>Windows 2003 Small Business Server:</p>
<ul>
<li>Minimum: 750 Mhz</li>
<li>512 MB RAM</li>
<li>16 GB Hard Disk Space</li>
</ul>
<p>Windows 2008 Small Business Server:</p>
<ul>
<li>Recommended: 2 GHz (x64 processor) or faster</li>
<li>Minimum: 4 GB RAM</li>
<li>Minimum: 60 GB Hard Disk Space</li>
</ul>
<p>That&#8217;s almost 3 times more CPU power and 8 times more RAM than the previous version. Based on those figures, expect Windows 2013 SBS to need a 6 Ghz CPU and 32 GB of RAM!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.tanist.co.uk/2008/10/windows-2008-first-gotcha-requires-mammoth-4gb-of-ram/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Slow MDB access in Windows 2008</title>
		<link>http://blog.tanist.co.uk/2008/10/slow-mdb-access-in-windows-2008/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.tanist.co.uk/2008/10/slow-mdb-access-in-windows-2008/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 14:26:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Henry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows Server]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[database]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mdb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[slow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows 2008]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tanist.co.uk/?p=3</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Recently we undertook a project to replace a Windows 2000 domain controller with a nice new Windows 2008 server. The old Windows 2000 server was responsible for sharing an MDB database. Since moving this database to the new server, we&#8217;ve experienced some rather frustrating performance issues.
The MDB application shows a lot of latency, taking several [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Recently we undertook a project to replace a Windows 2000 domain controller with a nice new Windows 2008 server. The old Windows 2000 server was responsible for sharing an MDB database. Since moving this database to the new server, we&#8217;ve experienced some rather frustrating performance issues.</p>
<p>The MDB application shows a lot of latency, taking several seconds between screens. Having looked at the <a title="MDB Performance FAQ" href="http://www.granite.ab.ca/access/performancefaq.htm" target="_blank">MDB Performance FAQ</a> we discovered that a technique called SMB signing can decrease network transfer speed by 10-25%. There are a couple of registry keys that can be tweaked:</p>
<blockquote><p>HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\System\CurrentControlSet\Services\Lanmanworkstation\Parameters\<strong>enablesecuritysignature</strong></p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\System\CurrentControlSet\Services\Lanmanworkstation\Parameters\<strong>requiresecuritysignature</strong></p></blockquote>
<p>On a domain controller the default setting is to have &#8220;requiresecuritysignature&#8221; set to 1. We&#8217;ve changed this to 0 and will report our findings back shortly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.tanist.co.uk/2008/10/slow-mdb-access-in-windows-2008/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
