<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Insert name here &#187; windows 2008</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.tanist.co.uk/tag/windows-2008/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.tanist.co.uk</link>
	<description>Web development and general IT snippets, possibly some other irrelevant things too.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 13:35:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>FATAL: DcPromo_JoinDomain: The server was not promoted to a domain controller.</title>
		<link>http://blog.tanist.co.uk/2008/10/fatal-dcpromo_joindomain-the-server-was-not-promoted-to-a-domain-controller/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.tanist.co.uk/2008/10/fatal-dcpromo_joindomain-the-server-was-not-promoted-to-a-domain-controller/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 08:00:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Henry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dcpromo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[error message]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[small business server]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows 2008]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tanist.co.uk/?p=30</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I ran into this little devil during my first installation of Windows 2008 Small Business Server (SBS). The setup failed with the error message:
FATAL: DcPromo_JoinDomain: The server was not promoted to a domain controller. 
The solution was surprisingly simple. An active network connection is required to start the setup, however I had disconnected the NIC [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I ran into this little devil during my first installation of Windows 2008 Small Business Server (SBS). The setup failed with the error message:</p>
<blockquote><p><span style="font-size: x-small; font-family: Verdana,Arial,Helvetica;">FATAL: DcPromo_JoinDomain: The server was not promoted to a domain controller. </span></p></blockquote>
<p>The solution was surprisingly simple. An active network connection is required to start the setup, however I had disconnected the NIC during setup. Bad move, this causes the setup to bail out. The solution, of course, is to make sure the network card remians connected for the duration of the setup.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.tanist.co.uk/2008/10/fatal-dcpromo_joindomain-the-server-was-not-promoted-to-a-domain-controller/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Windows 2008 &#8211; First gotcha, requires mammoth 4GB of RAM.</title>
		<link>http://blog.tanist.co.uk/2008/10/windows-2008-first-gotcha-requires-mammoth-4gb-of-ram/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.tanist.co.uk/2008/10/windows-2008-first-gotcha-requires-mammoth-4gb-of-ram/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 08:00:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Henry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows Server]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[memory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ram]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[requirement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sbs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[small business server]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows 2008]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tanist.co.uk/?p=24</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At long last, our HP ML310 server was delivered on Friday. After a bit of a kerfuffle hauling the enormous box up stairs on my own, the much anticipated unboxing could begin.  Well, actually I thought it only fair to fire off an email to everyone else to let them know it had arrived before [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At long last, our HP ML310 server was delivered on Friday. After a bit of a kerfuffle hauling the enormous <span style="color: black;">box</span> up stairs on my own, the much anticipated un<span style="color: black;">box</span>ing could begin.  Well, actually I thought it only fair to fire off an email to everyone else to let them know it had arrived before opening it up.</p>
<p>With politeness out the way, I made a start on opening the <span style="color: black;">box</span>. The arrival of a new server is always an exciting time in the office, lasting approximately 30 seconds (maximum). This server is particularly special as it&#8217;s for our own use. Unfortunately nobody else was around to share the moment and there was no way on earth it could remain <span style="color: black;">box</span>ed, especially not for an entire week while Chris was on holiday.</p>
<p>The plan was to setup the new server with Windows 2008 SBS, we have deployed Windows 2008 before but never Windows Server 2008 Small Business Server &#8211; which is due for release in early November.</p>
<p>With the SBS 2008 DVD in one hand and server in the other (err, you know what I mean), nothing could was going to stop me trying out the new OS. The DVD booted fine and setup began. I left it going in the background and approximately 30 minutes later I heard the fans spin up following a reboot. I eagerly awaited the GUI to load up. Then it hit me&#8230; a non continuable error message stating that 4GB of RAM was required.</p>
<p>I couldn&#8217;t believe this wasn&#8217;t detected earlier in the setup. Lesson learnt &#8211; don&#8217;t just assume your brand new server will meet the <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/sbs/en/us/system-requirements.aspx">minimum requirements</a>. SBS 2003 would run on pretty much anything, but 2008 requires a whole lot more. I guess with the ever decreasing cost of RAM this isn&#8217;t a huge problem. Never the less, it caught me out.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s just compare the difference in minimum requirements for SBS 2003 and SBS 2008</p>
<p>Windows 2003 Small Business Server:</p>
<ul>
<li>Minimum: 750 Mhz</li>
<li>512 MB RAM</li>
<li>16 GB Hard Disk Space</li>
</ul>
<p>Windows 2008 Small Business Server:</p>
<ul>
<li>Recommended: 2 GHz (x64 processor) or faster</li>
<li>Minimum: 4 GB RAM</li>
<li>Minimum: 60 GB Hard Disk Space</li>
</ul>
<p>That&#8217;s almost 3 times more CPU power and 8 times more RAM than the previous version. Based on those figures, expect Windows 2013 SBS to need a 6 Ghz CPU and 32 GB of RAM!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.tanist.co.uk/2008/10/windows-2008-first-gotcha-requires-mammoth-4gb-of-ram/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Slow MDB access in Windows 2008</title>
		<link>http://blog.tanist.co.uk/2008/10/slow-mdb-access-in-windows-2008/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.tanist.co.uk/2008/10/slow-mdb-access-in-windows-2008/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 14:26:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Henry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows Server]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[database]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mdb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[slow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows 2008]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tanist.co.uk/?p=3</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Recently we undertook a project to replace a Windows 2000 domain controller with a nice new Windows 2008 server. The old Windows 2000 server was responsible for sharing an MDB database. Since moving this database to the new server, we&#8217;ve experienced some rather frustrating performance issues.
The MDB application shows a lot of latency, taking several [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Recently we undertook a project to replace a Windows 2000 domain controller with a nice new Windows 2008 server. The old Windows 2000 server was responsible for sharing an MDB database. Since moving this database to the new server, we&#8217;ve experienced some rather frustrating performance issues.</p>
<p>The MDB application shows a lot of latency, taking several seconds between screens. Having looked at the <a title="MDB Performance FAQ" href="http://www.granite.ab.ca/access/performancefaq.htm" target="_blank">MDB Performance FAQ</a> we discovered that a technique called SMB signing can decrease network transfer speed by 10-25%. There are a couple of registry keys that can be tweaked:</p>
<blockquote><p>HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\System\CurrentControlSet\Services\Lanmanworkstation\Parameters\<strong>enablesecuritysignature</strong></p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\System\CurrentControlSet\Services\Lanmanworkstation\Parameters\<strong>requiresecuritysignature</strong></p></blockquote>
<p>On a domain controller the default setting is to have &#8220;requiresecuritysignature&#8221; set to 1. We&#8217;ve changed this to 0 and will report our findings back shortly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.tanist.co.uk/2008/10/slow-mdb-access-in-windows-2008/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
